Diagnostic accuracy of multitarget stool DNA testing for colorectal cancer screening: A systematic review and meta-analysis / Precisión diagnóstica de las pruebas de DNA en heces con objetivos múltiples para la detección del cáncer colorrectal: una revisión sistemática y un metaanálisis

Introduction: This study aimed to collect and summarize test data and conduct a meta-analysis, with respect to the Multitarget Stool DNA test sensitivity and specificity, compared to colonoscopy. Material and methods: All manuscripts were screened for eligibility according to inclusion criteria. Participants were a normal population at an average risk of developing CRC. Intervention was Stool based and DNA panel tests compared with colonoscopy, and outcome was detection of CRC and any pre-cancerous lesions. Inter-study and inconsistency (using the I-squared test) were assessed. Results: Meta-analyses of the Mt-sDNA test showed a combined sensitivity of 89%, 51%, and 76% for the detection of CRC, advanced adenoma (AA), and combined CRC and AA, respectively. The overall specificity was 91%, 89%, and 90% for the detection of CRC, AA, and combined CRC and AA, respectively. Conclusion: Mt-sDNA had significantly acceptable diagnostic accuracy for CRC and AA diagnosis, but still has lower sensitivity and specificity than colonoscopy.(AU)

Introducción: Este estudio tuvo como objetivo recopilar y resumir los datos de las pruebas y realizar un metaanálisis con respecto a la sensibilidad y especificidad de la prueba de DNA en heces multiobjetivo, en comparación con la colonoscopia. Material y métodos: Todos los manuscritos fueron examinados para determinar su elegibilidad de acuerdo con los criterios de inclusión. Los participantes eran una población normal con un riesgo promedio de desarrollar CRC. La intervención se basó en heces y pruebas de panel de DNA en comparación con la colonoscopia, y el resultado fue la detección de CRC y cualquier lesión precancerosa. Se evaluaron la inconsistencia entre estudios y la inconsistencia (mediante la prueba de I cuadrado). Resultados: Los metaanálisis de la prueba Mt-sDNA mostraron una sensibilidad combinada del 89%, 51% y 76% para la detección de CRC, adenoma avanzado (AA) y CRC y AA combinados, respectivamente. La especificidad general fue del 91%, 89% y 90% para la detección de CRC, AA y CRC y AA combinados, respectivamente. Conclusión: Mt-sDNA tuvo una precisión diagnóstica significativamente aceptable para el diagnóstico de CRC y AA, pero aún tiene una sensibilidad y especificidad más bajas que la colonoscopia.(AU)

Stool donor recruitment - A one-year experience.

Stool donors for fecal microbiota transference (FMT) should be rigorously screened to identify any disorder in health status. The success of our screening protocol to identify eligible donors in the last year and a half was evaluated and compared with the published literature. The target population was medical students who responded to 3 public calls to donate stools. Qualified donors brought stool samples to our lab. Out of the 110 students who responded to the call, 26 were enrolled as study donors and delivered at least one stool sample. The main reason for volunteer exclusion was body mass index (BMI) <18.5kg/m2 or >25kg/m2 (n=11) and for the identification of ESBL Escherichia coli in feces (n=3). Our success rate after the screening protocol was considered high. Understanding the incentives to participate is critical to the success of recruitment strategies as FMT is still a little-known practice for general population.

Stool donor recruitment – A one-year experience / Reclutamiento de donantes de heces: experiencia de un año

Stool donors for fecal microbiota transference (FMT) should be rigorously screened to identify any disorder in health status. The success of our screening protocol to identify eligible donors in the last year and a half was evaluated and compared with the published literature.The target population was medical students who responded to 3 public calls to donate stools. Qualified donors brought stool samples to our lab.Out of the 110 students who responded to the call, 26 were enrolled as study donors and delivered at least one stool sample. The main reason for volunteer exclusion was body mass index (BMI) <18.5kg/m2 or >25kg/m2 (n=11) and for the identification of ESBL Escherichia coli in feces (n=3).Our success rate after the screening protocol was considered high. Understanding the incentives to participate is critical to the success of recruitment strategies as FMT is still a little-known practice for general population.(AU)

Se debe seleccionar rigurosamente a los donantes de heces para la transferencia de microbiota fecal (TMF) para identificar cualquier trastorno en la salud. Se evaluó el éxito de nuestro protocolo de selección para identificar donantes idóneos en el último año y medio y se comparó con la literatura publicada.La población objetivo fueron estudiantes de medicina que respondieron a 3 convocatorias públicas para donar heces. Los donantes aptos llevaron muestras de heces a nuestro laboratorio.De los 110 estudiantes que respondieron a la convocatoria, 26 se inscribieron como donantes del estudio y entregaron al menos una muestra de heces. El principal motivo para la exclusión de voluntarios fue un índice de masa corporal (IMC) <18,5 kg/m2 o >25 kg/m2 (n=11) y la identificación de E. coli BLEE en las heces (n=3).Nuestra tasa de éxito tras el protocolo de selección se consideró alta. Comprender los incentivos para participar es fundamental para el éxito de las estrategias de reclutamiento, ya que la TMF sigue siendo una práctica poco conocida para la población en general.(AU)

Sangre oculta en heces en pacientes sintomáticos en Atención Primaria: Un estudio retrospectivo en el área sanitaria de Toledo / Faecal occult blood test in symptomatic patients in primary care: A retrospective study in a healthcare area of Toledo

Objetivo Revisar el protocolo de solicitud de sangre oculta en heces (SOH) en pacientes sintomáticos como prueba de derivación a colonoscopia, utilizando un punto de corte de 15μg Hb/g heces en 3 muestras consecutivas y comparar su utilidad con las recomendaciones actuales de un punto de corte de 10μg Hb/g heces en una muestra. Material y métodos Estudio observacional retrospectivo centrado en las peticiones de la prueba de SOH en pacientes sintomáticos en Atención Primaria. Las muestras fueron analizadas en el servicio de laboratorio durante el año 2017. En el análisis de datos se incluyeron 715 pacientes con la prueba de SOH positiva y 925 pacientes con resultado negativo. Se realizó un análisis descriptivo de los resultados de SOH, motivo de solicitud y colonoscopia, junto con el estudio de la utilidad diagnóstica de la prueba SOH para los puntos de corte de 10 y 15μg Hb/g heces en la misma población. Resultados La tasa de positividad de la prueba fue del 22,8% y la tasa de detección de cáncer colorrectal fue del 11%. El número de muestras no modifica la precisión diagnóstica. El valor predictivo negativo es superior con el punto de corte de 10μg Hb/g heces. Conclusione La selección correcta de pacientes y del punto de corte óptimo aumentan la tasa de detección de cáncer colorrectal. El cambio de protocolo de 10μg Hb/g heces y la recogida de una muestra para pacientes sintomáticos desde Atención Primaria mejoran la utilidad de la prueba SOH (AU)

Aim To review referral protocol in symptomatic patients from primary care of using 15μgHb/g faeces threshold with three consecutive samples in faecal occult blood (FOB) test. To compare test utility using current recommendations of 10μgHb/g faeces threshold and one sample. Material and methods A retrospective observational study was designed, including FOB samples of symptomatic patients from primary care. Samples were analyzed at the biochemistry laboratory in 2017. Seven hundred and fifteen patients tested positive and 925 patients negative. Exclusion criteria were secondary care request and patients under the age of 18. Descriptive analysis was performed of FOB results and clinical data about request and colonoscopy. FOB test's diagnostic utility was studied for different threshold (10 and 15μgHb/g faeces) in the same population. Results FOB positivity rate was 22.8% and cancer detection rate was 11%. However, the number of samples does not modify diagnostic precision. Negative predictive value is higher with 10μgHb/g faeces threshold. Conclusions Correct patient selection and optimal threshold increase cancer detection rate. The protocol with 10μgHb/g faeces threshold and one sample collection for symptomatic patients from primary care improves the FOB test's purpose (AU)

[Faecal occult blood test in symptomatic patients in primary care: A retrospective study in a healthcare area of Toledo]. / Sangre oculta en heces en pacientes sintomáticos en Atención Primaria: Un estudio retrospectivo en el área sanitaria de Toledo.

AIM: To review referral protocol in symptomatic patients from primary care of using 15µgHb/g faeces threshold with three consecutive samples in faecal occult blood (FOB) test. To compare test utility using current recommendations of 10µgHb/g faeces threshold and one sample. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective observational study was designed, including FOB samples of symptomatic patients from primary care. Samples were analyzed at the biochemistry laboratory in 2017. Seven hundred and fifteen patients tested positive and 925 patients negative. Exclusion criteria were secondary care request and patients under the age of 18. Descriptive analysis was performed of FOB results and clinical data about request and colonoscopy. FOB test's diagnostic utility was studied for different threshold (10 and 15µgHb/g faeces) in the same population. RESULTS: FOB positivity rate was 22.8% and cancer detection rate was 11%. However, the number of samples does not modify diagnostic precision. Negative predictive value is higher with 10µgHb/g faeces threshold. CONCLUSIONS: Correct patient selection and optimal threshold increase cancer detection rate. The protocol with 10µgHb/g faeces threshold and one sample collection for symptomatic patients from primary care improves the FOB test's purpose.

Trasplante de microbiota fecal para el tratamiento de la obesidad y de sus comorbilidades asociadas: Revisión

RESUMEN La obesidad es un problema de salud pública a nivel mundial. Existen evidencias sobre la interacción entre la microbiota intestinal, la regulación metabólica y la obesidad. El problema mundial de la obesidad impulsa el estudio de nuevas propuestas preventivas y/o terapéuticas. El trasplante de microbiota fecal (TMF) se proyecta como un posible tratamiento para la obesidad y sus comorbilidades asociadas. El objetivo de este estudio es sintetizar la documentación actual que existe sobre el efecto en parámetros metabólicos y clínicos que produce el TMF en humanos con obesidad, así como evidenciar la metodología empleada en el TMF. En los resultados primarios se señaló la existencia de cambios significativos en la composición de la microbiota intestinal (MI) y mejoría en marcadores metabólicos como disminución de la resistencia a la insulina (RI) y de la hemoglobina glicada (HbA1c), así como aumento de colesterol de alta densidad (HDL). Además, en marcadores clínicos como la disminución del índice de masa corporal y de la circunferencia de cintura. En los resultados secundarios se sustentó la necesidad de estandarizar el diseño experimental del TMF, iniciando con establecer la correcta selección de donantes hasta determinar el seguimiento del TMF a largo plazo. En conclusión, a pesar de que hay un número limitado de estudios y una falta de estandarización de las metodologías para llevar a cabo TMF, se han podido evidenciar algunas asociaciones metabólicas positivas, por lo que el TMF sigue siendo una opción potencialmente prometedora para el tratamiento coadyuvante de la obesidad.

ABSTRACT Obesity is a worldwide health problem. There is evidence of the interaction between the gut microbiota metabolic regulation, and obesity. The global problem of obesity has prompted the study of new preventive and/or therapeutic proposals. Fecal Microbiota Transplantation (FMT) is projected as a possible treatment for obesity and its associated comorbidities. The objective of this study is to synthesize the current documentation that exists on the effect in metabolic and clinical parameters produced by FMT in humans with obesity, as well as to make evident the methodology used in FMT. Primary results indicated the existence of significant changes in the composition of gut microbiota and improvement in some metabolic markers such as a decrease in insulin resistance (IR) and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), as well as an increase in high-density cholesterol (HDL). Further changed were noted in clinical markers such as the decrease in body mass index and waist circumference. Secondary results supported the need to standardize the experimental design of FMT, starting with establishing the correct selection of donors to determine the long-term follow-up of FMT. In conclusion, even though there is a limited number of studies and a lack of standardization on the methodology to carry out FMT, some positive metabolic associations have been shown, which is why FMT remains a potentially promising option for treatment adjuvant of obesity.

Recomendaciones para la selección del donante para la transferencia de microbiota fecal. Documento de posicionamiento avalado por la Societat Catalana de Digestologia, la Societat Catalana de Malalties Infeccioses i Microbiologia Clínica y el grupo GEMBIOTA de la Sociedad Española de Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica / Recommendations for stool donor selection for fecal microbiota transplant. Consensus document endorsed by the Catalan Society of Digestology, Catalan Society of Infectious diseases and Clinical microbiology and the GEMBIOTA group from Spanish Society of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology

La transferencia de microbiota fecal (TMF) es un tratamiento eficaz y seguro para tratar la infección recurrente por Clostridioides difficile. Es esencial extremar esfuerzos para que la TMF se realice con rigor y en base a los conocimientos científicos. La selección del donante de microbiota fecal es un punto clave del proceso para garantizar la seguridad del receptor. Es necesario disponer de protocolos de actuación que permitan a los clínicos actuar con las máximas garantías y minimizar los riesgos del procedimiento. Por este motivo, en Cataluña se ha constituido un grupo de trabajo multidisciplinario con el objetivo de establecer unas recomendaciones para la selección del donante de microbiota fecal.

Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is an effective and safe treatment to treat recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection. It is essential to make every effort to perform FMT rigorously and based on scientific knowledge. Selection of the fecal microbiota donor is a key point of the process to ensure recipient safety. It is necessary to have protocols of action that allow clinicians to act with the maximum guarantees and to minimize the risks of the procedure. For this reason, a multidisciplinary working group has been set up in Cataluña with the aim of establishing recommendations for the selection of the fecal microbiota donor.

Diagnostic accuracy of multitarget stool DNA testing for colorectal cancer screening: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to collect and summarize test data and conduct a meta-analysis, with respect to the Multitarget Stool DNA test sensitivity and specificity, compared to colonoscopy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: All manuscripts were screened for eligibility according to inclusion criteria. Participants were a normal population at an average risk of developing CRC. Intervention was Stool based and DNA panel tests compared with colonoscopy, and outcome was detection of CRC and any pre-cancerous lesions. Inter-study and inconsistency (using the I-squared test) were assessed. RESULTS: Meta-analyses of the Mt-sDNA test showed a combined sensitivity of 89%, 51%, and 76% for the detection of CRC, advanced adenoma (AA), and combined CRC and AA, respectively. The overall specificity was 91%, 89%, and 90% for the detection of CRC, AA, and combined CRC and AA, respectively. CONCLUSION: Mt-sDNA had significantly acceptable diagnostic accuracy for CRC and AA diagnosis, but still has lower sensitivity and specificity than colonoscopy.

Blood and faecal lead levels in children with various functional gastrointestinal disorders.

INTRODUCTION: To investigate the blood lead levels (BLLs) and faecal lead levels (FLLs) in children with various functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGIDs) and compare them with controls. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred and two children with FGIDs defined by the Rome IV criteria, aged 4-18 years, and one hundred and two sex matched healthy children were enrolled in the study. Children with FGIDs were divided into three subgroups as functional constipation (FC) (n = 36), functional abdominal pain (FAP) (n = 36) and functional nausea (FN) (n = 30). The lead levels were measured using atomic absorption spectrometer. RESULTS: The median BLLs in the FGIDs group was significantly higher than in controls (5.12 and 1.77 µg/dL, respectively). The BLLs were above 5 µg/dL in 51,9% of children with FGIDs. There was statistically significant difference in BLLs between FC subgroup and the other subgroups (FAP and FN) (p = 0.003, p < 0.001 respectively). The FLLs in the FGIDs group was significantly higher than in controls (28.08 and 0.01 µg/g, respectively). There was no significant difference in FLLs between FC subgroup and the other subgroups (p = 0.992, p = 0.989 respectively). No significant relation found between BLLs and FLLs of the FGIDs group (p = 0.123). CONCLUSION: This study revealed that children with FGIDs had higher BLLs and FLLs than controls and also more than half of children with FGIDs had BLLs ≥5 µg/dL which is considered as toxic level. These results might revive the question of whether or not clinicians need to evaluate routine BLLs in children with FGIDs.

Niveles séricos y fecales de plomo en niños con distintos trastornos digestivos funcionales / Blood and faecal lead levels in children with various functional gastrointestinal disorders

Introducción: El objetivo del estudio fue determinar los niveles séricos y fecales de plomo en niños con distintos trastornos digestivos funcionales (TDF) en comparación con controles sanos. Pacientes y métodos: La muestra incluyó a 102 niños de 4-18 años con TDF definidos mediante los criterios de Roma IV y a 102 controles sanos emparejados por edad y sexo. Los niños con TDF se dividieron en 3 subgrupos: estreñimiento funcional (EF) (n=36), dolor abdominal funcional (DAF) (n=36) y náuseas funcionales (NF) (n=30). Los niveles de plomo se midieron mediante espectrometría de absorción atómica. Resultados: El nivel de plomo en sangre (NPS) mediano fue significativamente mayor en niños con TDF en comparación con controles (5,12 vs. 1,77μg/dl). Los NPS superaron los 5μg/dl en el 51,9% del grupo TDF. Se observó una diferencia estadísticamente significativa en los NPS entre el subgrupo con EF y los otros 2subgrupos (DAF y NF) (p=0,003 y p<0,001, respectivamente). Los niveles de plomo en heces (NPH) fueron significativamente mayores en niños con TDF en comparación con controles (28,08 vs. 0,01μg/g). No hubo diferencias significativas en los NPH entre el subgrupo de EF y los otros subgrupos (p=0,992 y p=0,989). No se encontró una correlación significativa entre los NPS y los NPH en niños con TDF (p=0,123). Conclusión: El presente estudio demostró que los niveles séricos y fecales de plomo eran superiores en niños con TDF en comparación con controles y que más de la mitad de los niños con TDF tenían NPS ≥ 5μg/dl, que se consideran tóxicos. A la vista de estos resultados, cabe replantearse si los clínicos han de determinar los NPS de manera rutinaria en niños con TDF.(AU)

Introduction: To investigate the blood lead levels (BLLs) and faecal lead levels (FLLs) in children with various functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGIDs) and compare them with controls. Patients and methods: One hundred and 2children with FGIDs defined by the Rome IV criteria, aged 4 -18 years, and one hundred and 2sex matched healthy children were enrolled in the study. Children with FGIDs were divided into 3subgroups as functional constipation (FC) (n=36), functional abdominal pain (FAP) (n=36) and functional náusea (FN) (n=30). The lead levels were measured using atomic absorption spectrometer. Results: The median BLLs in the FGIDs group was significantly higher than in controls (5.12 and 1.77μg/dL, respectively). The BLLs were above 5μg/dL in 51,9% of children with FGIDs. There was statistically significant difference in BLLs between FC subgroup and the other subgroups (FAP and FN) (P=.003, P<.001 respectively). The FLLs in the FGIDs group was significantly higher than in controls (28.08 and 0.01μg/g, respectively). There was no significant difference in FLLs between FC subgroup and the other subgroups (P=.992, P=.989 respectively). No significant relation found between BLLs and FLLs of the FGIDs group (P =.123). Conclusion: This study revealed that children with FGIDs had higher BLLs and FLLs than controls and also more than half of children with FGIDs had BLLs ≥5μg/dL which is toxic level. These results might revive the question of whether or not clinician need to evaluate routine BLLs in children with FGIDs.(AU)

EPAGE no es una estrategia eficaz para la gestión de colonoscopias durante la pandemia por COVID-19 / The EPAGE guidelines are not an effective strategy for managing colonoscopies during the COVID-19 pandemic

Introducción: La pandemia producida por el virus SARS-CoV-2 ha generado un grave impacto en el funcionamiento de las unidades de endoscopia digestiva. La Asociación Española de Gastroenterología y la Sociedad Española de Endoscopia Digestiva (AEG-SEED) han propuesto la utilización de la guía European Panel on the Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy II (EPAGE) para la gestión de las colonoscopias pospuestas.Objetivo: Evaluar la guía EPAGE como herramienta de gestión en comparación con el test de sangre oculta en heces inmunológico (TSOHi) y con una calculadora de riesgo (CR), que incluye la edad, el sexo y el TSOHi, para la detección de cáncer colorrectal (CCR) y lesión significativa colónica (LSC).Métodos: Estudio unicéntrico prospectivo. Se incluyeron 743 pacientes derivados para una colonoscopia diagnóstica. Se clasificó cada solicitud según EPAGE en apropiada, indeterminada e inapropiada. Se les entregó un TSOHi y se calculó el valor de la CR.ResultadosEl TSOHi (p<0,001), pero no EPAGE (p = 0,742), fue una variable independiente de riesgo de CCR. El área bajo la curva receiver operating characteristic (ROC) de EPAGE, TSOHi y CR fue: 0,61(IC 95% 0,49 a 0,75), 0,95 (0,93 a 0,97) y 0,90 (0,87 a 0,93) para CCR; y 0,55 (0,49 a 0,61), 0,75 (0,69 a 0,813) y 0,78 (0,73 a 0,83) para LSC, respectivamente. El número necesario de colonoscopias para detectar un CCR y una LSC fue de 38 y siete para EPAGE, de siete y dos para TSOHi, y de 19 y cuatro para CR ≥ cinco puntos, respectivamente.Conclusión: La EPAGE, a diferencia del TSOHi, no es adecuada para seleccionar a los pacientes candidatos a colonoscopia diagnóstica para la detección de CCR. El TSOHi, en combinación con la edad y el sexo, es la estrategia correcta para gestionar la demanda de endoscopia en un escenario de acceso restrictivo.

Introduction: The pandemic caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus has had a serious impact on the functioning of gastrointestinal endoscopy Units. The Asociación Española de Gastroenterología (AEG) and the Sociedad Española de Endoscopia Digestiva (SEED) have proposed the EPAGE guidelines for managing postponed colonoscopies.ObjectiveTo evaluate the EPAGE guidelines as a management tool compared to the immunologic faecal occult blood test (iFOBT) and compared to risk score (RS) that combines age, sex and the iFOBT for the detection of colorectal cancer (CRC) and significant bowel disease (SBD).Methods: A prospective, single-centre study enrolling 743 symptomatic patients referred for a diagnostic colonoscopy. Each order was classified according to the EPAGE guidelines as appropriate, indeterminate or inappropriate. Patients underwent an iFOBT and had their RS calculated.Results: The iFOBT (p<0.001), but not the EPAGE guidelines (p = 0.742), was an independent predictive factor of risk of CRC. The ROC AUCs for the EPAGE guidelines, the iFOBT and the RS were 0.61 (95% CI 0.49-0.75), 0.95 (0.93-0.97) and 0.90 (0.87-0.93) for CRC, and 0.55 (0.49-0.61), 0.75 (0.69-0.813) and 0.78 (0.73-0.83) for SBD, respectively. The numbers of colonoscopies needed to detect a case of CRC and a case of SBD were 38 and seven for the EPAGE guidelines, seven and two for the iFOBT, and 19 and four for a RS ≥5 points, respectively.Conclusion: The EPAGE guidelines, unlike the iFOBT, is not suitable for screening candidate patients for a diagnostic colonoscopy to detect CRC. The iFOBT, in combination with age and sex, is the most suitable strategy for managing demand for endoscopy in a restricted-access situation

Recommendations for stool donor selection for fecal microbiota transplant. Consensus document endorsed by the Catalan Society of Digestology, Catalan Society of Infectious diseases and Clinical Microbiology and the GEMBIOTA group from Spanish Society of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology.

Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is an effective and safe treatment to treat recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection. It is essential to make every effort to perform FMT rigorously and based on scientific knowledge. Selection of the fecal microbiota donor is a key point of the process to ensure recipient safety. It is necessary to have protocols of action that allow clinicians to act with the maximum guarantees and to minimise the risks of the procedure. For this reason, a multidisciplinary working group has been set up in Cataluña with the aim of establishing recommendations for the selection of the fecal microbiota donor.

The EPAGE guidelines are not an effective strategy for managing colonoscopies during the COVID-19 pandemic. / EPAGE no es una estrategia eficaz para la gestión de colonoscopias durante la pandemia por COVID-19.

INTRODUCTION: The pandemic caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus has had a serious impact on the functioning of gastrointestinal endoscopy Units. The Asociación Española de Gastroenterología (AEG) and the Sociedad Española de Endoscopia Digestiva (SEED) have proposed the EPAGE guidelines for managing postponed colonoscopies. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the EPAGE guidelines as a management tool compared to the immunologic faecal occult blood test (iFOBT) and compared to risk score (RS) that combines age, sex and the iFOBT for the detection of colorectal cancer (CRC) and significant bowel disease (SBD). METHODS: A prospective, single-centre study enrolling 743 symptomatic patients referred for a diagnostic colonoscopy. Each order was classified according to the EPAGE guidelines as appropriate, indeterminate or inappropriate. Patients underwent an iFOBT and had their RS calculated. RESULTS: The iFOBT (p<0.001), but not the EPAGE guidelines (p = 0.742), was an independent predictive factor of risk of CRC. The ROC AUCs for the EPAGE guidelines, the iFOBT and the RS were 0.61 (95% CI 0.49-0.75), 0.95 (0.93-0.97) and 0.90 (0.87-0.93) for CRC, and 0.55 (0.49-0.61), 0.75 (0.69-0.813) and 0.78 (0.73-0.83) for SBD, respectively. The numbers of colonoscopies needed to detect a case of CRC and a case of SBD were 38 and seven for the EPAGE guidelines, seven and two for the iFOBT, and 19 and four for a RS ≥5 points, respectively. CONCLUSION: The EPAGE guidelines, unlike the iFOBT, is not suitable for screening candidate patients for a diagnostic colonoscopy to detect CRC. The iFOBT, in combination with age and sex, is the most suitable strategy for managing demand for endoscopy in a restricted-access situation.

Test para el diagnóstico precoz de lesiones premalignas de colon / A Test for Early Diagnosis of Premalignant Colonic Lesions

Introducción: El cáncer colorrectal en nuestro país ocupa la tercera causa de muerte por tumores malignos y constituye un problema de salud a nivel mundial, que en la actualidad es prevenible al realizar pruebas para la detección de lesiones premalignas. Objetivo: Evaluar el valor presuntivo de lesiones premalignas colónicas en pacientes con sangre oculta en las heces. Métodos: Se realizó estudio observacional, descriptivo, transversal, en pacientes con sangre oculta en las heces, atendidos en el Servicio de Gastroenterología del Hospital Docente Clínico Quirúrgico Diez de Octubre, a los cuales se les realizó colonoscopia, en el período comprendido de enero de 2016 a enero de 2017. Para evaluar las variables se utilizó el porcentaje como medida matemática y los resultados fueron expuestos en tablas. Resultados: Al finalizar el estudio se observó un predomino del sexo femenino. La pesquisa, el cambio del hábito intestinal y las diarreas crónicas fueron las indicaciones más frecuentes de sangre oculta en heces. Los pólipos y las lesiones de aspecto malignas fueron los diagnósticos colonoscópicos más frecuentes. Las lesiones de aspecto malignas se localizaron en mayor proporción en colon izquierdo. El diagnóstico histológico más frecuente fueron los adenomas y adenocarcinomas. Conclusiones: El test de sangre oculta en heces es un método predictivo en la pesquisa de lesiones premalignas y malignas de colon en pacientes atendidos en el primer nivel de atención(AU)

Introduction: In Cuba, colorectal cancer accounts for the third cause of death by malignant tumors, while it is a worldwide health problem, currently preventable by performing tests for the detection of premalignant lesions. Objective: To evaluate the presumptive value of colonic premalignant lesions in patients with fecal occult blood. Methods: An observational, descriptive and cross-sectional study was carried out in patients with fecal occult blood, who received attention in the gastroenterology service of Diez de Octubre Surgical Clinical Teaching Hospital and underwent colonoscopy, in the period from January 2016 to January 2017. To evaluate the variables, the percentage was used as a mathematical measure and the results were shown in tables. Results: At the end of the study, a predominance of the female sex was observed. Screening, change of bowel habit and chronic diarrhea were the most frequent indications of fecal occult blood. Polyps and malignant lesions were the most frequent colonoscopic diagnoses. Malignant-appearing lesions were mostly located in the left colon. The most frequent histological diagnosis was made up of adenomas and adenocarcinomas. Conclusions: The fecal occult blood test is a predictive method for the detection of premalignant and malignant lesions of the colon in patients who receive attention at the first level of care(AU)

Manejo de la infección por Helicobacter pylori en la edad pediátrica / Management of Helicobacter pylori infection in the pediatric age

El manejo de la infección por Helicobacter pylori en los niños es un dilema permanente en la práctica clínica. A lo largo de los años se han ido creando multitud de interrogantes respecto a los síntomas ligados a la infección, los métodos diagnósticos y los modos de tratamiento, siendo la más controvertida la indicación diagnóstica.En los últimos 10 años el colectivo pediátrico ha dispuesto de una guía elaborada por expertos de las Sociedades de Gastroenterología Pediátrica de Europa (ESPGHAN) y Estados Unidos (NASPGHAN) publicada en 2011 y actualizada en 2017 que nos ha orientado en el manejo de la infección por H.pylori en la edad pediátrica.El presente documento pretende unificar los criterios de indicación de estudio así como las pautas de diagnóstico y tratamiento de la infección por H.pylori en los niños y adolescentes para que puedan ser utilizadas tanto en atención primaria como en la clínica hospitalaria. (AU)

The management of Helicobacter pylori infection in children is a consistent problem in clinical practice. Over the years, many questions have been raised regarding symptoms associated with the infection, the diagnostic methods and type of treatment. What is most controversial is determining the criteria that enable us to initiate and carry out the study in children.In the last 10 years, pediatricians have followed the joint ESPGHAN/NASPGHAN guidelines published in 2011 and updated in 2017 in the management of H.pylori in children.This document aims to unify the study indication criteria as well as the diagnosis and treatment recommendations for H.pylori infection in children and adolescents, so they can be used in both Primary and Hospital care. (AU)

Management of Helicobacter pylori infection in the pediatric age.

The management of Helicobacter pylori infection in children is a consistent problem in clinical practice. Over the years, many questions have been raised regarding symptoms associated with the infection, the diagnostic methods and type of treatment. What is most controversial is determining the criteria that enable us to initiate and carry out the study in children. In the last 10 years, pediatricians have followed the joint ESPGHAN/NASPGHAN guidelines published in 2011 and updated in 2017 in the management of H. pylori in children. This document aims to unify the study indication criteria as well as the diagnosis and treatment recommendations for H. pylori infection in children and adolescents, so they can be used in both Primary and Hospital care.

[Management of Helicobacter pylori infection in the pediatric age]. / Manejo de la infección por Helicobacter pylori en la edad pediátrica.

The management of Helicobacter pylori infection in children is a consistent problem in clinical practice. Over the years, many questions have been raised regarding symptoms associated with the infection, the diagnostic methods and type of treatment. What is most controversial is determining the criteria that enable us to initiate and carry out the study in children. In the last 10 years, pediatricians have followed the joint ESPGHAN/NASPGHAN guidelines published in 2011 and updated in 2017 in the management of H.pylori in children. This document aims to unify the study indication criteria as well as the diagnosis and treatment recommendations for H.pylori infection in children and adolescents, so they can be used in both Primary and Hospital care.

Dolor abdominal crónico en un niño con Blastocystis hominis: a propósito de un caso / Chronic abdominal pain in a child with Blastocystis hominis: case report

RESUMEN El Blastocystis sp. es un parásito frecuente en el humano, identificado por el laboratorio en muestras de heces fecales. Se presentó el caso de un paciente de 5 años atendido en consulta de Gastroenterología en el Hospital Pediátrico Docente Provincial Eliseo Noel Caamaño, de Matanzas, por presentar dolor abdominal, heces pastosas, náuseas y vómitos desde hacía un año. Llevó tratamiento con ranitidina, omeprazol y domperidona, sin mejoría clínica. Se realizó estudio coproparasitológico en muestras de heces fecales seriadas, con la presencia del Blastocystis hominis. Se indicó tratamiento con metronidazol, sin mejoría clínica, y posteriormente se indicó como alternativa la nitazoxanida. Se evaluó a los 15 días, sin sintomatología y con negativización de las heces fecales seriadas. Resulta frecuente el desconocimiento y la poca importancia que los profesionales sanitarios muestran ante esta infestación, aunque cada vez más se confirma la participación del parásito en manifestaciones clínicas (AU).

ABSTRACT Blastocystis sp. is a frequent parasite in humans, identified in the laboratory in samples of fecal feces. The case of a 5-year-old patient is presented; he assisted the consultation of Gastroenterology in the Provincial Teaching Pediatric Hospital Eliseo Noel Caamaño in Matanzas, suffering abdominal pain, mash feces, nauseas and vomits for one year, and was treated with ranitidine, omeprazole and domperidone without clinical improvement. A coproparasitological study was carried out in serial fecal feces samples with the presence of Blastocystis hominis. Treatment with metronidazole was indicated without clinical improvement and them, as an alternative, nitazoxanide was indicated. He was evaluated at 15 days without symptoms and with negative serial fecal feces. The ignorance and the little importance that health professionals show towards this infestation are frequent, although more and more frequently it is confirmed the participation of the parasite in clinical manifestations (AU).

Stool donor recruitment - A one-year experience.

Stool donors for fecal microbiota transference (FMT) should be rigorously screened to identify any disorder in health status. The success of our screening protocol to identify eligible donors in the last year and a half was evaluated and compared with the published literature. The target population was medical students who responded to 3 public calls to donate stools. Qualified donors brought stool samples to our lab. Out of the 110 students who responded to the call, 26 were enrolled as study donors and delivered at least one stool sample. The main reason for volunteer exclusion was body mass index (BMI) <18.5kg/m2 or >25kg/m2 (n=11) and for the identification of ESBL Escherichia coli in feces (n=3). Our success rate after the screening protocol was considered high. Understanding the incentives to participate is critical to the success of recruitment strategies as FMT is still a little-known practice for general population.

Tiempo de excreción fecal de Escherichia coliproductora de toxina Shiga en niños con síndrome urémico hemolítico / Duration of fecal shedding of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli among children with hemolytic uremic syndrome

Introducción. Conocer el tiempo de excreción fecal de Escherichia coli productora de toxina Shiga (Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli; STEC, por sus siglas en inglés) en pacientes con síndrome urémico hemolítico sería útil para controlar la transmisión de la enfermedad.Objetivos. 1) Analizar las características del tiempo de excreción de STEC. 2) Evaluar la asociación con las variables sexo, edad, necesidad de diálisis, antibióticos y serotipos de STEC.Población y métodos. Estudio prospectivo, observacional, longitudinal y analítico. Período 2013-2019. Se realizaron coprocultivos al ingresar y cada 5-7 días hasta obtener 2 negativos. Se definió tiempo de excreción desde el inicio de la diarrea hasta el primer negativo. Se confirmó STEC por detección de los genes stx1, stx2 y rfbO157 por reacción en cadena de la polimerasa. Se calculó la media (IC 95 %) y percentilos del tiempo de excreción de STEC, y se compararon las variables estudiadas mediante el test de t.Resultados. Se incluyeron 43 pacientes. La media de tiempo de excreción fue 10,2 días (IC 95 %: 8,92-11,59), rango: 3-22 días. El 90 % de los pacientes negativizaron el coprocultivo a los 15 días. No hubo diferencias según sexo (p = 0,419), edad (p = 0,937), necesidad de diálisis (p = 0,917), antibióticos (p = 0,147) ni serotipos (p = 0,231).Conclusión. El 90 % de los pacientes negativizó el coprocultivo a los 15 días del inicio de la diarrea, y todos, al día 22. No se encontró asociación entre el tiempo de excreción y las variables estudiadas.

Introduction. Knowing the duration of fecal shedding of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli(STEC) among patients with hemolytic uremic syndrome would be useful to control disease transmission.Objectives. 1) To analyze the characteristics of STEC shedding duration. 2) To assess the association with sex, age, need of dialysis, antibiotics, and STEC serotypes.Population and methods. Prospective, observational, longitudinal, and analytical study in the 2013-2019 period. Stool cultures were done upon admission and every 5-7 days until 2 negative results were obtained. Shedding duration was defined as the period from diarrhea onset to the first negative result. STEC was confirmed with polymerase chain reaction detection of stx1, stx2, and rfbO157 genes. The mean (95 % CI) and percentile values of the STEC shedding duration were estimated, and the studied outcome measures were compared using the t test.Results. A total of 43 patients were included. The mean duration of shedding was 10.2 days (95 % CI: 8.92-11.59), range: 3-22 days. After 15 days, 90 % of patients had a negative stool culture. There were no differences in terms of sex (p = 0.419), age (p = 0.937), need of dialysis (p = 0.917), antibiotics (p = 0.147) or serotype (p = 0.231).Conclusion. Fifteen days after the onset of diarrhea, 90 % of patients had a negative stool culture, and all patients had one after 22 days. No association was observed between the duration of shedding and studied outcome measures.